Google has illegally broken into my Blogs over 100 times. Google has edited and illegally deleted some of my content. Additionally, X, Meta, and Google are still censoring many people, including me. Elon Musk never fixed any of the evil censorship that Jack Dorsey and his team built into the X software. We do not have online freedom of speech.
πππ
— THE PARZIVAL (@The1Parzival) November 12, 2025
- Today marks the 2 year anniversary of my Twitter Algo Finale Thread which racked up over 10 Million views.
- Despite the widespread sharing of this thread, X still has yet to fix any of these issues.
- How disappointing that .@realannapaulina had 2 years to do… https://t.co/DuP8YpVkJJ pic.twitter.com/aEUW4SOFkA
Evil X is deleting the truth.
I am not allowed to post this on X.
Armed conflict & terrorism (especially Al-Shabaab): Ongoing attacks, insecurity in rural areas, and contested territory make daily life dangerous and prevent normal commerce, schooling, and aid delivery. ACAPS
Large-scale humanitarian need: Roughly ~6 million people are projected to need humanitarian assistance in 2025, reflecting how persistent the crisis is. OCHA+1
Food insecurity & malnutrition: Somalia repeatedly faces crisis-level hunger, with warnings in 2025 of millions facing acute food insecurity and very high child malnutrition risk. The United Nations in Somalia+2OCHA+2
Climate shocks (droughts/floods) + disease outbreaks: Erratic rainfall, drought recovery that can reverse quickly, flooding, and outbreaks amplify hunger, displacement, and poverty. Amnesty International+1
Mass displacement: Conflict and climate shocks have pushed millions from their homes, creating long-term camps and urban strain. EU Civil Protection & Humanitarian Aid+1
Weak governance, corruption, and limited rule of law: Institutional capacity is still being rebuilt after decades of conflict; corruption and weak enforcement undermine services, trust, and investment. UNDP+2Knowledge Hub+2
Poverty, low job creation, and economic fragility: Growth has often been too weak to raise living standards broadly, and aid volatility can worsen conditions and fiscal space for safety nets. World Bank+1
Underfunded aid response / access constraints: Even when needs are clear, funding shortfalls (and insecurity in some areas) can sharply reduce assistance at the worst time. Reuters+1
Somalia is truly a paradise.
— Steven Crowder (@scrowder) November 25, 2025
The country has:
– 49% of the population inbred
– An average national IQ of 67 (70 qualifies for mental retardation)
– Four decades of nonstop civil war
– Fraud rings, violent gangs, and tribal militias everywhere
There is nothing enviable about any… https://t.co/tRIGEcM0UH pic.twitter.com/zX699NJuNA
India’s history stretches across more than five millennia and contains astonishing diversity—of languages and landscapes, beliefs and political visions, dazzling courts and quiet village rhythms. The story is not linear but braided: ancient urban civilizations alongside forest tribes, maritime cities trading with the world, devotional poets singing in dozens of tongues, and empires that rose and fragmented while ideas endured. Below is a concise big-picture view—from the first cities on the Indus to the world’s largest democracy.
Archaeology hints at human presence in the subcontinent from the Paleolithic era (hand-axes at Attirampakkam in Tamil Nadu, cave shelters at Bhimbetka). By the Neolithic, communities domesticated millets, rice, and zebu cattle, with early village cultures appearing across Baluchistan, peninsular India, and the Gangetic plains.
Around 2600–1900 BCE, the Indus (or Harappan) Civilization flourished along the Indus and its tributaries and into Gujarat. Urban centers such as Harappa, Mohenjo-daro, Dholavira, and Rakhigarhi displayed planned streets, standardized brickwork, sophisticated drainage, citadels, and granaries. A distinctive script—still undeciphered—appears on seals; weights and measures suggest vibrant commerce; craft quarters produced beads, faience, and metalwork; the dockyard at Lothal indicates maritime trade with Mesopotamia and beyond. This urban culture declined after 1900 BCE, probably due to climate stress, river shifts, and changing trade networks, giving way to regional cultures.
Between c. 1500 and 1000 BCE, Indo-Aryan–speaking pastoral groups entered northwestern India. Their hymns, preserved in the Rig Veda, reveal a world of cattle wealth, chieftains, and ritual specialists (Brahmins). Over centuries, pastoralists settled, iron technology spread, and agricultural societies grew across the Ganga basin. Later Vedic texts describe more complex polities, social stratification (varna), and elaborate sacrificial rituals.
By 600 BCE, the subcontinent featured many mahajanapadas (great states), from Gandhara and Kamboja in the northwest to Kosala, Magadha, and Avanti further east. Urbanization accelerated; coinage appeared; long-distance trade expanded; and new intellectual ferment arose.
The 6th–5th centuries BCE saw religious and philosophical transformations. Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha, articulated the Four Noble Truths and a path to end suffering through ethical conduct, meditation, and insight. Mahavira systematized Jain teachings around non-violence (ahimsa), ascetic discipline, and respect for all life. These ΕramaαΉa movements critiqued Vedic ritualism and offered alternative paths open beyond birth status.
At the same time, the Upanishads reinterpreted Vedic thought, probing the nature of reality (Brahman), self (Atman), and liberation (moksha). Epic narratives—the Mahabharata and Ramayana—evolved for centuries, weaving dharma (moral order) with political drama and devotion; later the Bhagavad Gita offered a synthesis of action, knowledge, and devotion.
In the wake of Alexander’s foray into northwest India (c. 326 BCE), Chandragupta Maurya founded the Mauryan Empire (c. 321–185 BCE) from Magadha, creating one of South Asia’s largest states. Under Ashoka (r. c. 268–232 BCE), Mauryan rule reached its zenith. After the bloody conquest of Kalinga, Ashoka embraced Buddhism and propagated dhamma—ethical governance emphasizing non-violence, religious tolerance, and welfare. His edicts, carved on pillars and rocks in Prakrit and other scripts, stand as early state communications to a diverse populace. The empire’s administrative sophistication—taxation, spies, provincial governors—was later memorialized in the Arthashastra (traditionally linked to Kautilya/Chanakya). After Ashoka, Mauryan power fragmented into regional kingdoms.
The centuries that followed saw a mosaic of polities and cultural efflorescence. In the northwest, Indo-Greek, Εaka (Scythian), and Kushan rulers linked India to Central Asian trade; the Kushan king Kanishka patronized Buddhism and facilitated artistic synthesis visible in Gandhara’s Greco-Buddhist sculpture. In the Deccan, the Satavahanasbalanced regional power and maritime trade across the Indian Ocean.
In the north, the Gupta Empire (4th–6th centuries CE) presided over what later scholars dubbed a “classical age.” Court poet Kalidasa composed lyrical dramas; the mathematician Aryabhata advanced astronomy and the concept of zero; Fahien, a Chinese pilgrim, described Buddhist sites and social life. Stone temples and Puranic Hinduism flourished, integrating devotion (bhakti) to Vishnu, Shiva, and the Goddess with local cults. Despite later nostalgic portrayals, Gupta power was not uniformly centralized; yet the period set enduring cultural idioms.
Thomas Jefferson remains one of the most intellectually generative—and morally fraught—figures in U.S. history. He is central not simply because he served as the third president, but because he helped supply the early republic with a political vocabulary (natural rights, popular sovereignty, religious liberty), a partisan infrastructure (the first durable opposition party), a governing style (skeptical of centralized authority yet capable of assertive executive action), and a geographic future (continental expansion). At the same time, Jefferson’s life makes visible the foundational contradiction of American liberalism: the cohabitation of universalistic claims about rights with a social and economic order sustained by racial slavery.
Jefferson’s intellectual formation is usually narrated through Enlightenment influence—reason, progress, empiricism, and a belief that political authority requires popular consent. But equally important is that his life unfolded within a Virginia planter society in which wealth, status, and political power were deeply entwined with land ownership and slavery. Jefferson’s ideals did not emerge outside that world; they were formulated inside it, often as an attempt to reconcile (or manage) tensions between republican aspiration and plantation reality.
His self-conception late in life is revealing. On his tombstone he asked to be remembered primarily as the author of the Declaration of Independence, the author of the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, and the father of the University of Virginia—prioritizing authorship and institution-building over holding office. (Thomas Jefferson's Monticello) The inscription was not accidental branding; it was Jefferson’s claim about what counted as lasting political work: ideas, laws, and civic architecture.
Jefferson’s most famous writing task came through the Continental Congress’s appointment of the “Committee of Five” to draft a declaration explaining independence. The committee included Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert R. Livingston; Jefferson was chosen as principal drafter, with editing by others and revisions by Congress. (National Archives)
Two points matter for serious analysis:
First, the Declaration is both a philosophical statement and a coalition document. Its logic of rights and consent reads like political theory, yet it was produced within the practical constraints of uniting diverse colonies. That dual character explains why certain themes—especially slavery—appear in unstable form. Jefferson’s draft included language condemning the slave trade and blaming the king, but revolutionary coalition politics constrained what could remain. Even without quoting the draft at length, the larger point stands: the Declaration’s final text represents not only Jefferson’s mind but also a political bargain among colonies with conflicting material interests.
Second, the Declaration’s meaning expanded far beyond its immediate purpose. In 1776 it was meant to justify secession from Britain. Over time, its claims about equality and rights became a normative standard invoked by later reformers. This “afterlife” is crucial: Jefferson’s words became tools that he did not fully control, and later Americans used them to critique American practices—including slavery, racial hierarchy, and exclusion from citizenship.
— Tom -πΊπΈ πΊπΈ- I follow back Patriots (@TomNo1Patriot) November 14, 2025
The history of the United States is the story of many peoples meeting on a vast continent, building institutions, clashing over ideals, and continually redefining freedom. From Indigenous civilizations to European colonization, revolution and republic, civil war and reconstruction, industrial growth and global leadership, social movements and technological transformation, the nation has evolved through conflict, compromise, and creativity. What follows is an accurate, big-picture overview from pre-colonial time to the 21st century.
Long before Europeans arrived, the lands that would become the United States were home to tens of millions of Indigenous people speaking hundreds of languages and developing diverse cultures. The Mississippian mound builders built urban centers like Cahokia near present-day St. Louis; in the Southwest, Ancestral Puebloan peoples constructed cliff dwellings and complex irrigation systems; on the Pacific Northwest, communities thrived on rich marine resources; in the Northeast woodlands, the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) formed a powerful confederacy with sophisticated systems of governance. Trade networks spanned the continent, spiritual and kinship ties shaped community life, and relationships with the land were central. This deep history is foundational: it reminds us the American story is not only a tale of newcomers, but also of continuity and resilience among Native nations who remain today.
The 16th and 17th centuries brought Spanish, French, Dutch, and English ventures to North America. Spain built missions and presidios in Florida and the Southwest; France established fur-trading posts along the St. Lawrence River and the Mississippi; the Dutch briefly controlled parts of the mid-Atlantic. English settlements, including Jamestown (1607) and Plymouth (1620), grew into thirteen colonies along the Atlantic seaboard. Colonization was never a simple transfer of European society: it meant adaptation to new environments, reliance on Indigenous knowledge, and frequent conflict and disease that devastated Native populations.
Labor systems diverged regionally. New England’s small farms and town meetings fostered a more communal political culture. The Middle Colonies (New York, Pennsylvania) became multicultural trading hubs. The Southern colonies relied heavily on plantation agriculture—tobacco, rice, indigo—and, increasingly, enslaved African labor. By the early 1700s, chattel slavery was embedded in colonial law and economy, laying the groundwork for profound moral and political conflicts to come.
The 18th century brought revivalist religious movements (the First Great Awakening) and imperial wars that bound colonists to Britain while also stirring local identities. The Seven Years’ War (1756–1763), known in North America as the French and Indian War, ended French power in most of the continent but left Britain with massive debts. Trying to recoup costs, Parliament asserted new taxes and regulations—the Stamp Act, Townshend Acts, Tea Act—without colonial representation. Colonists protested, boycotted, and articulated arguments for the rights of Englishmen and natural rights more broadly. Tensions escalated in the Boston Massacre (1770) and Boston Tea Party (1773). In 1774–1775, colonial leaders convened the Continental Congress and fighting broke out at Lexington and Concord.
No, this is different. AI and Robots will enhance humans work for many years, however in 40 to 50 years there will be no jobs left for humans. Elon Musk agrees with me.
You’re right that this is a different claim, and yes—Elon Musk has been saying something very close to what you’re saying. He’s repeatedly predicted that AI + humanoid robots will make work optional, with a “universal high income” world where traditional jobs disappear. Newsweek+3People.com+3Fox Business+3
Two important clarifications though:
Musk’s timeline is actually shorter than yours.
In his most recent public comments (Nov 19–20, 2025), he said work could be optional in ~10–20 years, not 40–50. Yahoo Finance+3People.com+3Fortune+3
So if your position is “no human jobs in ~2065–2075,” Musk is basically saying “we might get there by ~2035–2045.” You’re more conservative than he is on timing.
“No jobs left” depends on what we mean by a job.
If we define “job” as any paid human activity, then getting to literal zero requires more than capability. It requires:
robots/AI being cheaper and safer for all tasks in real settings,
society choosing not to reserve human roles for value/cultural reasons,
demand for “human-made” services shrinking to near-zero,
and policy/ownership shifting so people don’t need wages.
Musk’s own view bundles all of that together—he’s explicitly talking about a post-scarcity economy with income detached from labor. People.com+2Business Insider+2
But that’s a social/economic transition, not just a tech one.
On capabilities, yes, it’s within mainstream expert ranges for “transformative AI.”
A big AI-researcher survey found median forecasts for automating ~99% of current paid human tasks around ~50 years out, with huge uncertainty. arXiv
So your window matches a real “median-ish” line of thinking.
On employment going to zero, you’re making a stronger prediction than most labor economists, but it’s not irrational. It basically says:
Phase 1 (now → ~2040): AI enhances humans, lots of job churn.
Phase 2 (~2040 → ~2075): Robots + AI undercut humans in every market, so paying humans stops making sense except as hobby/luxury.
Phase 3: society formalizes a post-work economy.
That chain is internally consistent. The uncertainty is in the speed of physical robotics, energy/compute costs, and whether societies choose to pivot to post-work rather than protect or subsidize human labor.
The key “make-or-break” assumptions behind “no jobs left by ~2070” are:
Humanoid robotics scales cheaply (Optimus-like robots become as common as cars).
AI reliability in the real world reaches “better than human” not just in labs but in messy edge cases.
Ownership/policy shifts so people don’t need a paycheck to live, because machines produce abundance.
Musk is bullish on all three—which is why he sees a post-work world so soon. Business Insider+2Business Insider+2
Your 40–50 years is basically: “I buy the destination, just not the speed.”
AI tools like ChatGPT and Grok may not be perfect and sometimes give wrong information. They can also be very useful in helping people figure out what questions to ask their physicians.
Background:
About a year ago I had a blood test that showed very low blood platlets. My primary care physician was extermely concerned and told me I had to see a Hematologist. I had never seen a Hematologist previously and I quickly learned they are the doctors who test your blood for Cancer.
Luckily, I did not have Cancer, and they sent me to a Liver expert (Hematologist). I had a FibroScan, which showed that my liver was not causing my low blood platlets and severe fatigue. The liver doctor said that I am not properly diagnosed.
Now this is when I decided to ask the AI tools to help me.
When platelets are “trapped” in the spleen, it’s usually because the spleen is enlarged (splenomegaly). An enlarged spleen holds on to far more platelets than normal (up to ~90% vs ~30–40%), a process called hypersplenism, which lowers the platelet count in blood tests.
Common causes of an enlarged spleen → low platelets
Liver disease & portal hypertension: alcohol-related liver disease, viral hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, splenic/portal vein thrombosis (incl. from pancreatitis).
Hematologic cancers & marrow disorders: lymphomas, leukemias, myelofibrosis, other myeloproliferative disorders.
Infections: EBV/mononucleosis, CMV, HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, bacterial endocarditis, chronic hepatitis.
Autoimmune/inflammatory conditions: Felty’s syndrome (RA + neutropenia + splenomegaly), systemic lupus, sarcoidosis.
Infiltrative/storage diseases: amyloidosis, Gaucher disease.
Congestive causes: advanced heart failure, massive transfusion or severe hemolysis causing congestion.
Evaluate the cause: CBC with smear, liver panel, hepatitis/HIV tests as indicated, abdominal ultrasound (spleen size, portal/splenic veins), and targeted testing for suspected conditions.
Treat the underlying problem (e.g., manage liver disease, treat infection, address hematologic disorder). Platelets usually rise as the spleen shrinks or sequestration improves.
Urgent care if platelets <20–30k, active bleeding, new severe abdominal pain, fever, or confusion.
If you share any labs, symptoms, or known conditions, I can help think through what’s most likely in your situation—but this isn’t a diagnosis and doesn’t replace seeing a clinician.
For thousands of years, farming relied on hard work, intuition, and the rhythm of the seasons. Today, technology has joined that partnership — giving farmers new tools to grow more food with less waste, less labor, and greater precision than ever before.
Modern tractors and harvesters are no longer just big engines with wheels. They’re intelligent systems equipped with GPS, sensors, and data-driven controls. Farmers can now plant rows with centimeter-level accuracy, automatically adjust fertilizer rates, and even track soil moisture across entire fields — all from a touchscreen in the cab.
These “smart farms” use automation to save time, fuel, and money, while reducing soil compaction and improving yields. The result? More efficiency, less environmental impact.
Drones have taken to the skies as the eyes of the modern farmer. With high-resolution cameras and infrared imaging, they scan crops for early signs of stress, disease, or drought long before the human eye can see them. That information feeds into cloud-based farm management software, allowing farmers to pinpoint problem areas, manage irrigation schedules, and make informed decisions in real time.
Some farms even use autonomous drones to spray nutrients or pesticides exactly where they’re needed — saving chemicals and protecting nearby ecosystems.
Precision agriculture ties it all together. Sensors in the soil measure pH, temperature, and nutrient levels; satellites provide daily updates on plant growth; and AI models forecast yields or suggest planting patterns. This technology turns farming into a science of data — where each seed, drop of water, and hour of sunlight can be optimized for maximum output.
Technology isn’t just about bigger yields — it’s about sustainability. Water-efficient irrigation, electric farm vehicles, and renewable energy systems are helping farmers reduce emissions and costs while keeping food affordable. The next step: connecting small family farms with smart tools so that technology empowers every grower, not just the largest operations.
Even in the age of sensors and satellites, farming still depends on human wisdom — the experience to know when to trust the data, and when to trust the soil. Technology helps, but it doesn’t replace the farmer’s instinct, creativity, and connection to the land.
John Adams (1735–1826) was never America’s smoothest politician—but he may have been one of its most essential. As the second President of the United States (1797–1801), Adams governed at a moment when the country was young, fragile, and surrounded by bigger powers that expected it to fail. His presidency is often remembered for controversy—especially the Alien and Sedition Acts—yet it also featured one of the most consequential acts of restraint in early American history: keeping the United States out of a full-scale war with France during the crisis that became the XYZ Affair and the Quasi-War. (Office of the Historian)
Adams was born in Braintree, Massachusetts (today part of Quincy), in a world shaped by church life, small farms, and local town politics. New England’s culture put a premium on literacy, argument, and civic duty—traits that fit Adams like a glove. He attended Harvard, taught school briefly, and then turned to the law, where he discovered the power of institutions: written rules, procedures, and precedent. That institutional mindset—the belief that stable government matters more than personal glory—would become a defining thread through his life.
Adams wasn’t a romantic revolutionary. He could be fired up, even scorching, but he also had a lawyer’s fear of chaos. He wanted independence and liberty, yet he also wanted courts, laws, and enforceable order. In a revolution, that combination can be rare—and priceless.
Adams emerged as a major voice of independence in the Continental Congress. He was a strong advocate for separation from Britain and helped drive the push toward a final break. But his contributions weren’t only speeches. Adams also threw himself into the less glamorous work: committees, drafting, planning, and keeping the wheels turning.
Where Adams especially shined was in diplomacy and persistence. The United States had to convince skeptical European powers that the American cause was real and worth supporting. That meant endless negotiation, cultural friction, and political patience—none of which came naturally to Adams, yet he did it anyway. His diplomatic service helped secure international recognition and support for the new nation, and it established him as a founding-era heavyweight well before he ever became president. (Modern presidential histories emphasize Adams’s deep Revolutionary service and intellectual influence.) (Miller Center)
No serious look at John Adams works without Abigail. Their relationship—grounded in constant correspondence—was one of the most important private partnerships in early American public life. Abigail was politically aware, blunt, strategic, and unusually well informed for her era. Adams relied on her judgment and emotional steadiness, especially during long stretches away from home.
That correspondence also reveals something vital about Adams: he was ambitious and proud, but also intensely self-critical. He worried about his reputation and feared he would be misunderstood. Ironically, he often was.
Adams served as the first vice president for two terms under George Washington. The office at the time had little defined authority beyond presiding over the Senate—work that Adams found tedious and, at times, humiliating. Yet the experience taught him something crucial: in a republic, power is deliberately constrained, and even prominent figures must accept limits.
It also placed him near the center of the emerging partisan fight. The new nation quickly divided into competing visions—what we often simplify as Federalists vs. Democratic-Republicans. Adams leaned Federalist in temperament (stronger national government, emphasis on order), but he was not always aligned with the party’s most aggressive strategists.
