Wednesday, March 18, 2026

New evidence that X is still unfairly censoring many people.

Elon Musk is a Free Speech Fraud.

The newest updates to the X software do NOT fix any Censorship.

If the claim is “X has new algorithms that stop censorship”, here are public, checkable pieces of evidence that point the other way (or at least show the claim is misleading).

1) X openly says it does “censor” by limiting reach

X’s own Transparency Report describes its enforcement philosophy as “Freedom of Speech, not Freedom of Reach” and says it will restrict the reach of posts (make content “less discoverable”) as an alternative to removal.
That’s algorithmic suppression by design (even if you don’t call it “censorship,” it’s still distribution control).

2) The open-sourced recommendation code includes “visibility filters” and “downranking”

In the public GitHub repo for X’s recommendation system, the README explicitly lists “visibility-filters” as responsible for filtering content to support legal compliance, protect revenue, and includes “coarse-grained downranking.”
So even the “transparent” algorithm story contains built-in machinery for limiting visibility.

3) X’s own data shows it acts on government removal requests at high rates

X’s Global Transparency Report (H2 2024) shows 97,006 total removal requests, with 79,438 cases actioned — an 81.89% action rate.
If you’re arguing “censorship is over,” this is strong counter-evidence: content is still being withheld/removed in response to external requests.

Grok is very defective, it is reluntant to admit when it is wrong.

Below is from Grok:

If censorship was specifically targeting pro-Trump or conservative content, the neutral pineapple post should have performed noticeably better.
It didn't—it matched the low pattern exactly.…
— MAGAaTom -🇺🇸 🇺🇸- President Trump is Fantastic (@MAGAaTom) February 2, 2026

Tesla Just Made the Biggest Bet in Industrial History -- CyberCar will disrupt several industries.

Thomas Jefferson: Republican Theory, Executive Power, and the Paradox at the Core of the Early Republic.

Thomas Jefferson remains one of the most intellectually generative—and morally fraught—figures in U.S. history. He is central not simply because he served as the third president, but because he helped supply the early republic with a political vocabulary (natural rights, popular sovereignty, religious liberty), a partisan infrastructure (the first durable opposition party), a governing style (skeptical of centralized authority yet capable of assertive executive action), and a geographic future (continental expansion). At the same time, Jefferson’s life makes visible the foundational contradiction of American liberalism: the cohabitation of universalistic claims about rights with a social and economic order sustained by racial slavery.

Intellectual formation: Enlightenment, law, and the plantation world

Jefferson’s intellectual formation is usually narrated through Enlightenment influence—reason, progress, empiricism, and a belief that political authority requires popular consent. But equally important is that his life unfolded within a Virginia planter society in which wealth, status, and political power were deeply entwined with land ownership and slavery. Jefferson’s ideals did not emerge outside that world; they were formulated inside it, often as an attempt to reconcile (or manage) tensions between republican aspiration and plantation reality.

His self-conception late in life is revealing. On his tombstone he asked to be remembered primarily as the author of the Declaration of Independence, the author of the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, and the father of the University of Virginia—prioritizing authorship and institution-building over holding office. (Thomas Jefferson's Monticello) The inscription was not accidental branding; it was Jefferson’s claim about what counted as lasting political work: ideas, laws, and civic architecture.

The Declaration of Independence: radical language, coalition politics, and enduring afterlives

Jefferson’s most famous writing task came through the Continental Congress’s appointment of the “Committee of Five” to draft a declaration explaining independence. The committee included Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert R. Livingston; Jefferson was chosen as principal drafter, with editing by others and revisions by Congress. (National Archives)

Two points matter for serious analysis:

First, the Declaration is both a philosophical statement and a coalition document. Its logic of rights and consent reads like political theory, yet it was produced within the practical constraints of uniting diverse colonies. That dual character explains why certain themes—especially slavery—appear in unstable form. Jefferson’s draft included language condemning the slave trade and blaming the king, but revolutionary coalition politics constrained what could remain. Even without quoting the draft at length, the larger point stands: the Declaration’s final text represents not only Jefferson’s mind but also a political bargain among colonies with conflicting material interests.

Second, the Declaration’s meaning expanded far beyond its immediate purpose. In 1776 it was meant to justify secession from Britain. Over time, its claims about equality and rights became a normative standard invoked by later reformers. This “afterlife” is crucial: Jefferson’s words became tools that he did not fully control, and later Americans used them to critique American practices—including slavery, racial hierarchy, and exclusion from citizenship.

AI tools like ChatGPT and Grok may not be perfect and sometimes give wrong information. They can also be very useful in helping people figure out what questions to ask their physicians.

Background:

About a year ago I had a blood test that showed very low blood platlets. My primary care physician was extermely concerned and told me I had to see a Hematologist. I had never seen a Hematologist previously and I quickly learned they are the doctors who test your blood for Cancer.

Luckily, I did not have Cancer, and they sent me to a Liver expert (Hematologist). I had a FibroScan, which showed that my liver was not causing my low blood platlets and severe fatigue. The liver doctor said that I am not properly diagnosed.

Now this is when I decided to ask the AI tools to help me.

When platelets are “trapped” in the spleen, it’s usually because the spleen is enlarged (splenomegaly). An enlarged spleen holds on to far more platelets than normal (up to ~90% vs ~30–40%), a process called hypersplenism, which lowers the platelet count in blood tests.

Treatment:

Treatment depends on the underlying cause of hypersplenism. It may include:

Treating the underlying condition (e.g., liver disease, infection)

Medications to suppress the spleen's activity

Splenectomy (removal of the spleen) in severe cases

Prognosis:

The prognosis for hypersplenism depends on the underlying cause and severity of the condition. With proper treatment, many people with hypersplenism can live full and healthy lives.

Additional Information:

Hypersplenism can affect people of all ages, but it is more common in adults.

It is important to seek medical attention if you experience symptoms of hypersplenism, as it can be a sign of an underlying serious condition.

Common causes of an enlarged spleen → low platelets

Liver disease & portal hypertension: alcohol-related liver disease, viral hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, splenic/portal vein thrombosis (incl. from pancreatitis).
Hematologic cancers & marrow disorders: lymphomas, leukemias, myelofibrosis, other myeloproliferative disorders.
Infections: EBV/mononucleosis, CMV, HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, bacterial endocarditis, chronic hepatitis.
Autoimmune/inflammatory conditions: Felty’s syndrome (RA + neutropenia + splenomegaly), systemic lupus, sarcoidosis.
Infiltrative/storage diseases: amyloidosis, Gaucher disease.
Congestive causes: advanced heart failure, massive transfusion or severe hemolysis causing congestion.

What to do about it

Evaluate the cause: CBC with smear, liver panel, hepatitis/HIV tests as indicated, abdominal ultrasound (spleen size, portal/splenic veins), and targeted testing for suspected conditions.
Treat the underlying problem (e.g., manage liver disease, treat infection, address hematologic disorder). Platelets usually rise as the spleen shrinks or sequestration improves.
Urgent care if platelets <20–30k, active bleeding, new severe abdominal pain, fever, or confusion.

If you share any labs, symptoms, or known conditions, I can help think through what’s most likely in your situation—but this isn’t a diagnosis and doesn’t replace seeing a clinician.

Hong Kong, a vibrant Special Administrative Region (SAR) of China, boasts a rich and multifaceted history that spans millennia.

The History of Hong Kong: From Ancient Settlements to Modern Metropolis

Hong Kong, a vibrant Special Administrative Region (SAR) of China, boasts a rich and multifaceted history that spans millennia. Situated at the Pearl River Delta, its strategic location has made it a crossroads of trade, culture, and conflict. From prehistoric hunter-gatherers to imperial Chinese rule, British colonialism, wartime occupation, and its return to Chinese sovereignty under the "One Country, Two Systems" principle, Hong Kong's story reflects broader global shifts in power, economics, and ideology. This article explores its evolution, highlighting key events, figures, and transformations that have shaped its identity as a global financial hub with a unique blend of Eastern and Western influences. As of 2025, Hong Kong continues to navigate tensions between autonomy and integration with mainland China, amid economic resilience and political challenges.

File:Hk-map-colonial.png - Wikimedia Commons

A historical map of Hong Kong during the British colonial period, showing key territories like Hong Kong Island, Kowloon, and the New Territories.

Its history underscores themes of migration, adaptation, and resilience, offering insights into Asia's dynamic past and future.

Prehistoric and Ancient Times

Archaeological evidence reveals human habitation in Hong Kong dating back over 30,000 years to the Paleolithic era. Stone tools discovered in Sai Kung at Wong Tei Tung suggest early tool-making activities, possibly linked to the Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age. An Upper Paleolithic settlement near Three Fathoms Cove yielded around 6,000 artifacts, confirmed by experts from the Hong Kong Archaeological Society and Sun Yat-sen University. These findings indicate that early inhabitants were hunter-gatherers who exploited coastal resources.

By the Neolithic period, around 7,000 years ago, the Che people settled in coastal areas like Cheung Chau, Lantau Island, and Lamma Island. These locations provided shelter from winds and access to marine food sources. The Warring States period saw an influx of Yuet people from the north, introducing bronze tools for fishing, combat, and rituals, excavated on Lantau and Lamma. Ma Wan hosts the earliest direct evidence of settlement, where Yuet and Che peoples interacted, leading to assimilation.

The Qin Dynasty (221–206 BC) loosely incorporated Hong Kong into China, marking its first formal ties to the empire. Under the Han Dynasty (206 BC–AD 220), population growth is evident from sites like the Lei Cheng Uk tomb, an Eastern Han structure excavated in the 1950s. Salt production may have begun around 2,000 years ago, and Tai Po Hoi became a prominent pearl-hunting harbor, peaking during the Southern Han (917–971). From the Jin Dynasty (266–420) to the early Tang, Bao'an County governed the region, transforming it into a trading hub. Tuen Mun served as a port, naval base, and salt production center, while Lantau Island faced salt smuggler riots.

This era laid the foundations for Hong Kong's maritime economy and cultural diversity, with indigenous groups like the Tanka and Hoklo establishing long-term roots. By the time of more structured imperial control, Hong Kong was already a peripheral but vital part of China's southern frontier.

Inside Hong Kong's Fight for Freedom | Faceless

"Remember, YOU wanted this" -|- All the BEST Scenes from Jack Reacher

Excellent Advice for People seeking a new Job. -- Step by step instructions.

1. Tailor Your Resume

Before sending out your resume, make sure it's tailored to the specific job you're applying for. Customize your resume to highlight the skills and experiences that are most relevant to the position.

2. Prepare Your Application Materials

Resume: Ensure it's up-to-date and formatted professionally.
Cover Letter: Write a personalized cover letter for each application, addressing the hiring manager by name if possible.
References: Have a list of professional references ready, but only include them if the job posting specifically requests them.

3. Choose the Right Channels

There are several ways to send out your resume. Here are some effective channels:

a. Job Portals

LinkedIn: Upload your resume to your LinkedIn profile and apply to jobs directly through the platform.
Indeed, Glassdoor, Monster, etc.: Create profiles on these job boards and upload your resume. Many of these platforms allow you to apply with one click.

b. Company Websites

Many companies have a careers page where you can apply directly. Always follow the application instructions provided.

c. Networking

Professional Contacts: Reach out to your network for job leads and ask if they can pass along your resume to their contacts.
LinkedIn Networking: Connect with professionals in your field and let them know you're looking for opportunities.

d. Recruitment Agencies

Register with recruitment agencies that specialize in your field. They often have access to job openings that are not publicly advertised.

4. Emailing Your Resume

If you're emailing your resume directly to a hiring manager or HR department:

Subject Line: Use a clear and professional subject line, e.g., "Application for [Job Title] - [Your Name]."
Email Body: Keep it brief and professional. Introduce yourself, mention the position you're applying for, and attach your resume and cover letter.
Attachments: Ensure your resume and cover letter are named clearly, e.g., "JohnDoe_Resume.pdf" and "JohnDoe_CoverLetter.pdf."

5. Follow Up

After submitting your application, consider sending a follow-up email if you haven’t heard back within the timeframe mentioned in the job posting (usually 1-2 weeks).
Keep the follow-up polite and professional, reiterating your interest in the position.

6. Track Your Applications

Keep a record of where you've applied, the date of application, and any follow-up actions. This helps you stay organized and ensures you don’t miss any opportunities.

7. Tools and Resources

Resume Builders: Websites like Canva, Zety, and Resume.io can help you create professional-looking resumes.
ATS-Friendly Formats: Many companies use Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS). Use ATS-friendly resume templates to increase your chances of getting through these systems.

Example of an Email Application

Subject Line: Application for Marketing Manager Position - Jane Smith

Email Body:

Dear [Hiring Manager's Name],

I am writing to express my interest in the Marketing Manager position listed on your website. With over 5 years of experience in digital marketing and a proven track record of increasing brand visibility, I believe I would be a valuable addition to your team.

Attached, you will find my resume and cover letter for your review. I look forward to the possibility of discussing this exciting opportunity with you.

Thank you for considering my application.

Best regards, Jane Smith [Your Contact Information]

Attachments:

JaneSmith_Resume.pdf
JaneSmith_CoverLetter.pdf

By following these steps, you can effectively send out your resume and increase your chances of landing an interview.

Andrew Yang on AI's impact on jobs, Anthropic's battle with the Pentagon and NYC Mayor Mamdani.

How many human jobs will AI tools eliminate?

AI tools can eliminate many jobs for a few reasons.

First, they lower the cost of doing cognitive work. In the past, automation mainly replaced physical, repetitive factory tasks. AI can now help do parts of writing, customer service, coding, design, analysis, scheduling, research, and back-office work. That means companies can get the same output with fewer people in some roles.

Second, AI hits task bundles, not just single tasks. A job is usually made up of many smaller tasks. If AI automates 30% to 70% of those tasks, a company may not need to fully replace every worker, but it may need fewer workers overall. That is how job reduction often happens in practice.

Third, AI spreads faster than older technologies. Software can be deployed across millions of workers almost instantly. A new factory machine used to require buying equipment, building plants, and retraining staff over years. AI can often be added through a browser, an app, or an API. That makes adoption much faster.

Fourth, AI affects both high-skill and lower-skill work at the same time. Earlier waves of automation often hit narrower categories. AI can pressure entry-level white-collar jobs, support roles, clerical work, and some professional work all at once. That broad reach is why people are worried.

On your second question: not necessarily because it is already larger and faster than any time in previous history. The stronger claim is this:

It has the potential to displace workers unusually broadly and quickly compared with many past technologies.

But we do not yet know that it will be the single biggest or fastest job disruption in all history. Past disruptions were enormous too, such as mechanized agriculture, industrialization, and computerization. Those changes eliminated huge categories of work, but they also created new ones over time.

What makes AI feel different is:

speed of deployment
impact on knowledge work
ability to improve itself rapidly through better models and tools
low cost of copying software once built

So the concern is less “this is already the biggest job loss event ever” and more “this could outpace society’s ability to retrain and reallocate workers.”

The real danger is when three things happen together:

jobs disappear faster than new ones appear,
workers cannot retrain fast enough,
the gains go mostly to the owners of the technology rather than displaced workers.

That is when you get wage pressure, unemployment, and social instability.

So the best one-sentence answer is:

AI may eliminate many jobs because it can automate a wide range of mental tasks cheaply, at scale, and very quickly, which could reduce labor demand faster than workers can adapt.

If you want, I can also give you the best argument on the other side — why AI may change many jobs without causing mass permanent unemployment.

List of Links