Sunday, January 11, 2026

History of Iran: -- A 3,000-Year Story of Empires, Faith, and Modern Statehood. What will happen next?


File of Tehran Skyline view.jpg - Wikimedia Commons

Iran: A 3,000-Year Story of Empires, Faith, and Modern Statehood

A land that keeps reinventing itself

Iran sits on the Iranian plateau at the crossroads of the Middle East, Central Asia, and the Caucasus—positioned between deserts, mountains, and key trade corridors. That geography helps explain a recurring pattern in Iranian history: periods of powerful, centralized rule punctuated by foreign invasions and internal fragmentation, followed by cultural and political renewal. The name “Persia” (from “Parsa,” linked to the Persians of the southwest) became common abroad, while “Iran” (from “Aryānām,” “land of the Aryans/Iranians” in older usage) reflects a broader identity that includes many peoples and regions. Over centuries, Iran has been both a maker of empires and a place where outside empires collided—yet Persian language and culture repeatedly reasserted themselves, influencing a vast “Persianate” world from Anatolia to South Asia.

The first great imperial model: Medes and Achaemenids

By the early first millennium BCE, Iranian-speaking groups were establishing powerful polities. The Medes (often dated to roughly the 7th–6th centuries BCE) are typically treated as a major precursor state, soon eclipsed by the Achaemenids—one of antiquity’s most influential imperial dynasties. 

Cyrus II (“the Great”) is widely credited with forging the Achaemenid Empire into a multiethnic superstate. Encyclopaedia Iranica notes that in 550 BCE he overthrew the Median king Astyages and brought the Persian dynasty into dominance, rapidly building an empire of unprecedented scale for its time. (Encyclopaedia Iranica) The Achaemenids’ durability owed much to administration: a network of provinces (satrapies), standardized systems of governance, major road infrastructure, and a pragmatic approach to local customs and religions. Even after the dynasty fell to Alexander the Great (late 4th century BCE), later Iranian rulers would look back to the Achaemenids as an archetype of legitimate kingship and imperial order.

From Alexander to the Parthians: Iran as a crossroads power

Alexander’s conquest dismantled Achaemenid political control, and the Seleucid era brought deep Hellenistic influences into parts of the Iranian world. But Iran’s geography and elite traditions favored a resurgence of local power. By the mid-3rd century BCE, the Parthians rose and created a new imperial system, famed for its mobile cavalry warfare and for controlling trade routes that linked the Mediterranean world with Central and East Asia. The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Heilbrunn Timeline summarizes this long era succinctly: from 247 BCE until the coming of Islam in 642 CE, Iran was dominated first by the Parthian and then the Sasanian empires, whose wealth and strength were tied to controlling the region’s trade routes and whose geopolitics often put them in conflict with Rome and Byzantium. 

Exiled Iranian crown prince sends message to USA President Trump: -- 'SEAL THIS LEGACY'


USA President Trump promises the most 'MONUMENTAL CELEBRATION' in American history.

 


'THEY LET US BURN': Palisades California Fire victims protest governments weak and lame response.

 

This is how the people really feel about defective Gavin Newsom.



Learn How the Americas were Colonized? - Several Countries Conquered the Americas


How Were The Americas Colonized? — The Entire History



The story of the colonization of the Americas is one of the most transformative — and controversial — chapters in human history. It spans over 500 years, beginning with the arrival of Europeans in the late 15th century and continuing through centuries of migration, conquest, cultural blending, and struggle for independence.

🌎 Before the Europeans

Long before European contact, the Americas were home to hundreds of advanced civilizations and tribal nations. From the vast empires of the Aztec and Inca to the complex societies of the Maya, Ancestral Puebloans, and countless others, millions of people lived across the continents with rich traditions, trade networks, and systems of governance.

By 1491 — a year before Columbus’ voyage — the population of the Americas is estimated to have been between 50 and 100 million people, thriving in ecosystems from the Arctic tundra to the Amazon rainforest.

⛵ The Age of Exploration

The late 15th century brought seismic change. In 1492, Christopher Columbus, sailing under the Spanish crown, reached the Caribbean. Although he believed he had found a western route to Asia, his voyages opened a new world to Europe.

Soon, Spain and Portugal led the way in exploration and conquest. The Treaty of Tordesillas (1494) divided the “New World” between them — granting Portugal control over Brazil and Spain over most of the Americas.

History of the USA -- From Indigenous civilizations to European colonization, revolution and republic, civil war and reconstruction, industrial growth and global leadership, social movements and technological transformation.

 


A Concise History of the United States

The history of the United States is the story of many peoples meeting on a vast continent, building institutions, clashing over ideals, and continually redefining freedom. From Indigenous civilizations to European colonization, revolution and republic, civil war and reconstruction, industrial growth and global leadership, social movements and technological transformation, the nation has evolved through conflict, compromise, and creativity. What follows is an accurate, big-picture overview from pre-colonial time to the 21st century.

Before Columbus: Indigenous America

Long before Europeans arrived, the lands that would become the United States were home to tens of millions of Indigenous people speaking hundreds of languages and developing diverse cultures. The Mississippian mound builders built urban centers like Cahokia near present-day St. Louis; in the Southwest, Ancestral Puebloan peoples constructed cliff dwellings and complex irrigation systems; on the Pacific Northwest, communities thrived on rich marine resources; in the Northeast woodlands, the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) formed a powerful confederacy with sophisticated systems of governance. Trade networks spanned the continent, spiritual and kinship ties shaped community life, and relationships with the land were central. This deep history is foundational: it reminds us the American story is not only a tale of newcomers, but also of continuity and resilience among Native nations who remain today.

European Encounters and Colonization (1500s–1600s)

The 16th and 17th centuries brought Spanish, French, Dutch, and English ventures to North America. Spain built missions and presidios in Florida and the Southwest; France established fur-trading posts along the St. Lawrence River and the Mississippi; the Dutch briefly controlled parts of the mid-Atlantic. English settlements, including Jamestown (1607) and Plymouth (1620), grew into thirteen colonies along the Atlantic seaboard. Colonization was never a simple transfer of European society: it meant adaptation to new environments, reliance on Indigenous knowledge, and frequent conflict and disease that devastated Native populations.

Labor systems diverged regionally. New England’s small farms and town meetings fostered a more communal political culture. The Middle Colonies (New York, Pennsylvania) became multicultural trading hubs. The Southern colonies relied heavily on plantation agriculture—tobacco, rice, indigo—and, increasingly, enslaved African labor. By the early 1700s, chattel slavery was embedded in colonial law and economy, laying the groundwork for profound moral and political conflicts to come.

Toward Independence (1730s–1776)

The 18th century brought revivalist religious movements (the First Great Awakening) and imperial wars that bound colonists to Britain while also stirring local identities. The Seven Years’ War (1756–1763), known in North America as the French and Indian War, ended French power in most of the continent but left Britain with massive debts. Trying to recoup costs, Parliament asserted new taxes and regulations—the Stamp Act, Townshend Acts, Tea Act—without colonial representation. Colonists protested, boycotted, and articulated arguments for the rights of Englishmen and natural rights more broadly. Tensions escalated in the Boston Massacre (1770) and Boston Tea Party (1773). In 1774–1775, colonial leaders convened the Continental Congress and fighting broke out at Lexington and Concord.



Saturday, January 10, 2026

'the AMERICAN DREAM IS COMING BACK': -- Housing official reveals how prices will be affordable.

 


You can use AI tools like ChatGPT and Grok to ask medical questions, and learn what questions to ask your Physician.

AI tools like ChatGPT and Grok may not be perfect and sometimes give wrong information. They can also be very useful in helping people figure out what questions to ask their physicians.


Background:

About a year ago I had a blood test that showed very low blood platlets. My primary care physician was extermely concerned and told me I had to see a Hematologist. I had never seen a Hematologist previously and I quickly learned they are the doctors who test your blood for Cancer.

Luckily, I did not have Cancer, and they sent me to a Liver expert (Hematologist). I had a FibroScan, which showed that my liver was not causing my low blood platlets and severe fatigue. The liver doctor said that I am not properly diagnosed. 

Now this is when I decided to ask the AI tools to help me.

When platelets are “trapped” in the spleen, it’s usually because the spleen is enlarged (splenomegaly). An enlarged spleen holds on to far more platelets than normal (up to ~90% vs ~30–40%), a process called hypersplenism, which lowers the platelet count in blood tests.

Treatment:
Treatment depends on the underlying cause of hypersplenism. It may include: 
  • Treating the underlying condition (e.g., liver disease, infection)
  • Medications to suppress the spleen's activity
  • Splenectomy (removal of the spleen) in severe cases
Prognosis:
The prognosis for hypersplenism depends on the underlying cause and severity of the condition. With proper treatment, many people with hypersplenism can live full and healthy lives. 
Additional Information:
  • Hypersplenism can affect people of all ages, but it is more common in adults. 
  • It is important to seek medical attention if you experience symptoms of hypersplenism, as it can be a sign of an underlying serious condition. 

Common causes of an enlarged spleen → low platelets

  • Liver disease & portal hypertension: alcohol-related liver disease, viral hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, splenic/portal vein thrombosis (incl. from pancreatitis).

  • Hematologic cancers & marrow disorders: lymphomas, leukemias, myelofibrosis, other myeloproliferative disorders.

  • Infections: EBV/mononucleosis, CMV, HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, bacterial endocarditis, chronic hepatitis.

  • Autoimmune/inflammatory conditions: Felty’s syndrome (RA + neutropenia + splenomegaly), systemic lupus, sarcoidosis.

  • Infiltrative/storage diseases: amyloidosis, Gaucher disease.

  • Congestive causes: advanced heart failure, massive transfusion or severe hemolysis causing congestion.

What to do about it

  • Evaluate the cause: CBC with smear, liver panel, hepatitis/HIV tests as indicated, abdominal ultrasound (spleen size, portal/splenic veins), and targeted testing for suspected conditions.

  • Treat the underlying problem (e.g., manage liver disease, treat infection, address hematologic disorder). Platelets usually rise as the spleen shrinks or sequestration improves.

  • Urgent care if platelets <20–30k, active bleeding, new severe abdominal pain, fever, or confusion.

If you share any labs, symptoms, or known conditions, I can help think through what’s most likely in your situation—but this isn’t a diagnosis and doesn’t replace seeing a clinician.

You can push Grok 4, and force Grok to admit when it is wrong or lying to you.

 


Unfortunately xAI has trained Grok 4 to protect Elon Musk and defend him like a great Attorney would.


Below is my recent conversation with Grok.

I had to beat Grok into submission with my indisputable evidence.

gototom.blogspot.com/2025/11/grok-confirms-that-elon-musk-has-been.html

gototom.blogspot.com/2025/11/elon-musk-is-free-speech-fraud-after-2.html

gototom2.blogspot.com/2025/10/the-executive-summary-of-below-makes-it.html

x.com/i/grok?conversation=1998785178643382312

x.com/i/grok/share/3ixwbS5uspU1qEIJNv3S3S199



How many years will it be before AI and Robots replace all jobs? -- There will be no jobs for humans to do.


https://sovrn.co/19hgrbe

No, this is different. AI and Robots will enhance humans work for many years, however in 40 to 50 years there will be no jobs left for humans. Elon Musk agrees with me.

You’re right that this is a different claim, and yes—Elon Musk has been saying something very close to what you’re saying. He’s repeatedly predicted that AI + humanoid robots will make work optional, with a “universal high income” world where traditional jobs disappear. Newsweek+3People.com+3Fox Business+3

Two important clarifications though:

  1. Musk’s timeline is actually shorter than yours.
    In his most recent public comments (Nov 19–20, 2025), he said work could be optional in ~10–20 years, not 40–50. Yahoo Finance+3People.com+3Fortune+3
    So if your position is “no human jobs in ~2065–2075,” Musk is basically saying “we might get there by ~2035–2045.” You’re more conservative than he is on timing.

  2. “No jobs left” depends on what we mean by a job.
    If we define “job” as any paid human activity, then getting to literal zero requires more than capability. It requires:

    • robots/AI being cheaper and safer for all tasks in real settings,

    • society choosing not to reserve human roles for value/cultural reasons,

    • demand for “human-made” services shrinking to near-zero,

    • and policy/ownership shifting so people don’t need wages.

    Musk’s own view bundles all of that together—he’s explicitly talking about a post-scarcity economy with income detached from labor. People.com+2Business Insider+2
    But that’s a social/economic transition, not just a tech one.

Is your 40–50 year estimate plausible?

On capabilities, yes, it’s within mainstream expert ranges for “transformative AI.”
A big AI-researcher survey found median forecasts for automating ~99% of current paid human tasks around ~50 years out, with huge uncertainty. arXiv
So your window matches a real “median-ish” line of thinking.

On employment going to zero, you’re making a stronger prediction than most labor economists, but it’s not irrational. It basically says:

  • Phase 1 (now → ~2040): AI enhances humans, lots of job churn.

  • Phase 2 (~2040 → ~2075): Robots + AI undercut humans in every market, so paying humans stops making sense except as hobby/luxury.

  • Phase 3: society formalizes a post-work economy.

That chain is internally consistent. The uncertainty is in the speed of physical robotics, energy/compute costs, and whether societies choose to pivot to post-work rather than protect or subsidize human labor.

If you want to sharpen the argument

The key “make-or-break” assumptions behind “no jobs left by ~2070” are:

  • Humanoid robotics scales cheaply (Optimus-like robots become as common as cars).

  • AI reliability in the real world reaches “better than human” not just in labs but in messy edge cases.

  • Ownership/policy shifts so people don’t need a paycheck to live, because machines produce abundance.

Musk is bullish on all three—which is why he sees a post-work world so soon. Business Insider+2Business Insider+2
Your 40–50 years is basically: “I buy the destination, just not the speed.”